Integrevise for Trinity College Dublin

Scale the microviva across the assessments that matter.

Trinity already recommends oral interviews, vivas and microvivas to evidence understanding and thought ownership. Integrevise makes short oral verification consistent and reviewable across larger cohorts while Trinity academics retain every assessment decision.

Compare assessment priorities See the value for Trinity

Why Trinity is ready for this approach

The assessment direction already favours student explanation.

Trinity's GenAI guidance describes detection as unrealistic and unachievable. Its academic-integrity guidance instead calls for evidence of authorship, critical thinking and thought ownership.

Trinity's positionViva over probability

Current guidance says no technology can conclusively identify AI-generated material and recommends oral interviews, vivas and presentations as evidence of thought ownership.

The established model

Short microvivas can confirm process and concepts.

Trinity already identifies pre-recorded microvivas as a practical way for students to demonstrate ownership of their work.

The operational gap

Consistency across programmes and larger cohorts.

Programme teams need common questioning, rubrics and reviewable records without placing every conversation in an academic's diary.

What Integrevise adds

Infrastructure for short, evidence-led oral verification.

Integrevise uses the student's submission, assignment brief, rubric and learning outcomes to conduct a five to ten minute adaptive oral verification. It supports formative and summative assessment and does not classify text as AI-generated.

Academics receive a transcript, evidence pack, scoring rationale and tutor notes. Trinity sets the criteria and decides how the evidence informs assessment.

Read the peer-reviewed study

For studentsA transparent way to show thought ownership

Students explain decisions, reasoning and process in their own words.

For academicsStructured evidence with academic control

Staff review comparable evidence and focus live attention where judgement is needed.

For programmesA repeatable verification layer

Teams can apply consistent criteria across modules while preserving disciplinary practice.

Aligned with Trinity's published guidance

Programme-level assessment design gains a scalable oral layer.

Trinity encourages multiple modes of assessment, evidence of students' thought development and programme-focused design. Integrevise supplies consistent questioning and structured evidence while academic ownership stays with each programme.

Trinity GenAI and assessment guidance Assessment-design guidance Oral examination and microvivas

Trinity prioritisesThought ownership, oral evidence and programme design

Integrevise addsConsistent questioning and structured evidence at scale

A focused first conversation

Compare microviva priorities before changing anything.

Twenty minutes is enough to compare Trinity's priorities for thought ownership, programme consistency and academic workload.

Compare priorities No assessment redesign required.